Michael Mukasey, whose statements on
torture and question of suspected terrorists touched off a
partisan Senate fight, have won verification to be the adjacent U.S.
Mukasey overcame resistance from Democrats who said he
should have got taken a less equivocal place on torture. The late-
night ballot yesterday was 53-40 with six Democrats and Joseph
Lieberman of Connecticut, an independent, supporting the
nomination. Four Democratic presidential campaigners and one
Republican, Toilet McCain of Arizona, didn't vote.
The new lawyer general, the 3rd to function under President
George W. Bush, will presume leading of a Justice Department
that have been damaged by complaints of partisan politics. Supporters
of Mukasey said he would reconstruct morale at the department.
''Judge Mukasey's verification come ups at a critical moment
for the Justice Department and for our nation,'' Shrub said in a
statement released after the Senate vote. ''Judge Mukasey is a
man of strong fictional character and integrity, with exceeding legal
Mukasey, 66, a retired federal judge, is put to be sworn in
at the Justice Department's American Capital central office later today,
said White Person House spokesman Tony Fratto.
''He'll get meeting with staff right away,'' Fratto said.
Mukasey wins Alberto Gonzales, who resigned in August
after his inability to explicate the ejector of nine U.S. attorneys
cost him back up among Republicans and Democrats in Congress. Congressional commissions are still pressing Shrub to let
presidential Pluto attest about their engagement in the
'Chance for Change'
''This is our opportunity for change,'' said Golden State Democrat
Dianne Feinstein, whose ailments about the U.S. attorney
dismissals triggered the investigations that drove Gonzales from office. Mukasey ''will be a non-political, non-partisan attorney
During verification hearings, Mukasey pledged to keep
politics out of criminal prosecution and vowed to vacate if Bush
were to disregard his advice that an of import enterprise would be
unconstitutional. These statements drew congratulations from most
Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Mukasey's nomination encountered problem when he refused to
say whether waterboarding, an question technique that
simulates drowning, was illegal torture.
That and other rough question techniques became an
issue followers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency used
waterboarding to pull out information from three al-Qaeda
operatives after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Judiciary Committee President Saint Patrick Leahy of Green Mountain State and
seven other Democrats on the panel opposed Mukasey. His
nomination cleared the panel with the ballots of just two
Democrats, Feinstein and Prince Charles Schumer of New York, and nine
Mukasey said he establish waterboarding ''repugnant'' yet
refused to state whether it was illegal torture.
''If waterboarding is torture, torment is
unconstitutional,'' he said at the hearings last month. In a
written response to a missive by senators seeking a fuller
explanation, Mukasey refused to give a legal sentiment based on
''hypotheticals'' instead of ''the existent facts and
Prairie State Senator Dick Durbin, the Senate's No. Two Democrat,
said ''Judge Mukasey's place on waterboarding is troubling''
because ''he wouldn't reply direct inquiries about other torture
techniques'' even though military functionaries see them to be
torture. ''Sadly, helium said clip and again that his replies would
depend on the facts and circumstances.''
'Put People at Risk'
Republicans defended Mukasey's refusal to render a legal
opinion about the legality of question techniques that are
''Judge Mukasey establish himself in a state of affairs where an
expression of sentiment by him would set people at risk'' of
prosecution or a civil suit, said Keystone State Republican Arlen
The Shrub disposal hasn't said whether intelligence
agents ever engaged in waterboarding, which is outlawed as a
military technique. Still, Shrub have insisted that the government
has never used torture.
Schumer recommended brother New Yorker Mukasey to replace
Gonzales. He and Feinstein argued that new leading was needed
at the Justice Department to reconstruct the agency's political
independence and encouragement low pressure morale caused by the controversies
that led to the surrenders of Gonzales and other top officials
involved in fire the U.S. attorneys.
''The Department of Justice, one of the crown gems among
our authorities institutions, is now afloat and rudderless,''
Schumer said. ''Politics had been allowed to infect all mode of
decision-making'' and now the federal agency ''desperately necessitates a strong
and independent leader at the helm. I believe Judge Mukasey is
Gonzales, who was White Person House advocate during Bush's first
term as president, succeeded Toilet Ashcroft as lawyer full general in
To reach the newsman on this story:
James Rowley in American Capital at